![vray rt opencl benchmark vray rt opencl benchmark](https://www.noticias3d.com/imagenes/noticias/202011/nvidia-geforce-rtx-3060-ti-geekbench.png)
You cant benchmark over a proprietary maner. And for me the only way is openCL because it is open. Also dont forget that he have to deal with the price(8 $5K($40,000) against 4 $4K($16,000)) maybe he find that the cheaper solution isn't the faster one but maybe faster enough.īut here they put a card against a card. Then put a box with 8 k6000(8 is the total of cards that the "Nvidia maximum" alow) against 4 w9100(4 is the total of cards that amd said that should put in one system).ĭo you think it is fair? From the point of view of a renderfarm owner perhaps, because he dont look at a card but at a solution. Issue for such markets (sha7bot is spot on in that regard).
#Vray rt opencl benchmark driver
Having said that, the large VRAM should make quite a difference for medical/GISĪnd defense imaging, but then we come back to driver reliability which is a huge (Igor, ask Chris about the AE CUDA test a friend of mine is preparing). Raw specs, the W9100 ought to be a lot quicker than it is for some of the tests Is bound to show the FirePro in a more positive light.
![vray rt opencl benchmark vray rt opencl benchmark](https://www.cgdirector.com/wp-content/uploads/media/2018/09/2713581-img_1231.jpg)
Perform when using its native CUDA for accelerating relevant tasks vs. The picture is incomplete though without comparing to how the Quadro would If the audience is out there, AMD's FirePro W9100 should help reclaim some of the company's workstation market share. It'll be interesting to see how many professionals dig deep for no-compromise speed in their performance-sensitive software. You get a mix of speed in 3D tasks and general-purpose compute-intensive apps, or both at the same time.
#Vray rt opencl benchmark professional
How does the FirePro W9100 fare in our final analysis, then? The $4000 card's price tag is justified by excellent performance, versatility across mature professional segments and the latest workloads, and unmatched connectivity. And in the end, the FirePro W9100 surfaces as a strong candidate for high-end workstation duty, particularly when your workload is well-suited to the GPU's strengths (and the driver team's priorities). Compared to the slower Quadro K5000 at $1800 and the faster Quadro K6000 at $5000, AMD isn't far off the mark, though. The FirePro W9100's heat sink and fan undoubtedly sacrifice some of the board's performance potential, since Hawaii is known to perform best under optimal cooling.ĪMD is showing some confidence in pricing its FirePro W9100 at $4000. Nvidia does this successfully with its Quadro cards, and AMD should start following suit. Instead, professional cards need to push thermal energy out from their I/O brackets. The challenge, of course, is that those gaming products start exhausting heat inside your chassis, and that just doesn't fly in the workstation world. By redesigning the cooler, some of the company's board partners have already demonstrated that Hawaii can be made to run at much lower temperatures than 92 ☌. One opportunity for improvement is an underwhelming thermal solution, which we've seen previously on AMD's desktop-oriented reference cards.